More Silly Memes
Jul. 23rd, 2007 09:42 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This one is just silly, although I like the result.....

Your Score: Very Logical
You are 100 % Logical.

Excellent! You rival Spock in Spockiness. Live long and prosper.
Link: The How Logical Are You Test written by masterfiremaam on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the The Dating Persona Test |
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 12:03 pm (UTC)Your Score: Very Logical
You are 80 % Logical.
Excellent! You rival Spock in Spockiness. Live long and prosper.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 12:15 pm (UTC)Your Score: Muon
74% Particle Physics Knowledge
Good job! You obviously have paid attention to what is going on in particle physics. You might appreciate reading articles in nature (http://www.nature.com/physics/index.html) about physics. The universe is an amazing place, and research in particle physics is constantly bringing humanity closer to understanding it!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-31 08:37 am (UTC)Your Score: Quark-gluon plasma
92% Particle Physics Knowledge
Either you are an amazing arm-chair physicist, an actual physicist, or are dating a physicist. If not, you should consider it. You certainly have been paying attention to what is going on in physics. To even further your physics knowledge (there will be some amazing new discoveries soon!) try reading http://physics.physorg.com/. You will likely be able to appreciate a lot of it!
Link: The particle physics knowledge Test (http://www.okcupid.com/tests/1585295598997527430/particle-physics-knowledge) written by ackey (http://www.okcupid.com/profile?u=ackey) on OkCupid Free Online Dating (http://www.okcupid.com), home of the The Dating Persona Test (http://www.okcupid.com/online.dating.persona.test)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-31 08:46 am (UTC)That's a good (read: time-sucking) website it links to though......
no subject
Date: 2007-07-31 08:53 am (UTC)The 4 flavours of quark question really threw me, because I'd never heard 'bottom' described as 'beauty' before, but I guess it makes sense. Feynman diagrams still give me the willies though :)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-31 09:00 am (UTC)I guess someone had a particular predilection for bottoms :D
On a related note, PH and I were doing "opposites" whilst walking back from nursery one day last week:
PH: What's the opposite of "up"?
RH: "Down"! What's the opposite of "top"?
PH: "Bottom"!
RH: What's the opposite of "strange"?
PH: ???
RH: It's "charmed", lad. Remember that - it'll serve you well in later life.
I got a quizzical look from a hedge-cutting neighbour.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-31 09:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-31 09:11 am (UTC)I've just launched that particular conversation to the world at large here (http://racinghippo.livejournal.com/184415.html).